Transcripts

Discussion on open Coin Selection matters

Date

19 September, 2023

Speakers

Not available

pencil icon

Transcript by

  • Topic: review of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27601
    • Problem statement: when doing manual RBF (without using bumpfee RPC) we treat previous change output as a receiver and thus create two outputs to the same address
    • Proposal: combine amount on outputs to the same address
    • What are valid use-cases for having the same address for change and output?
      • Consolidation with payment
        • Alternative: Use sendall with two outputs one with an amount and yours without an amount
      • Payment and send at least X to yourself
      • Consolidate with automatic coin selection of at least X
        • Alternative: Implement "Send at least" as a separate and explicitly feature
    • Consider just giving an error if change destination is the same with one of the outputs
      • Should we do the enforcement only at RPC level?
        • No, because this is risky
    • We don't want to fix manual RBF, because we have bumpfee RPC
      • Maybe you can also take original TX and give to fundrawtransaction
  • Topic: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26732
    • CreateTransactionInternal should remove UTXOs conflicting with preselected
  • Topic: Where do we make change decisions? During tx building or coin selection?
    • Whether we create change, how big it is and the type
    • We determine the size of the change twice
      • One time to feed into coinselection
      • Second time when we do the actual tx building
    • One approach is to let coinselection pick change type
    • Conclusion so far: Status quo remains
  • Topic: Bug when BnB produce change https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28180
    • Min_viable_change is different from cost_of_change and it doesn't include change_fee * Zeroing out coins selection params for SFFO is bad
      • We need to fix change_fee
    • One solution: Reduce upper bound for BnB when SFFO
    • Another solution: disable BnB and exact knapsack when user requested SFFO
    • SFFO use cases are still unclear
  • Topic: Coin grinder algorithm
    • Find a solutions with minimum weight and always creating change
    • Differences from BnB
      • when fee rate is lower than LTFR
      • Always find a solutions because we have change
    • Why lower first?
      • To minimize liquidity in flight
    • How to avoid grinding it to very small UTXO set
      • Only use it at high fee rates
      • Use multiple of LTFR
    • Next steps: Run the simulations
  • Topic: Knapsack removal
    • Useful because consolidatory
    • Need more research on changeless solutions not found by BnB
    • CoinGrinder replaces lowest larger
    • Garbage collection for negative effective value

Transcripts

Community-maintained archive to unlocking knowledge from technical bitcoin transcripts

Transcripts

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TLDRSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?Give Feedback